F.A.Q.

Answer:  Preston Smith's role in the Packers' defense has been crucial, particularly in enhancing their pass rush. His ability to generate pressure and contribute to sacks gives the defense a much-needed edge, allowing for greater dynamic play and opening opportunities for teammates like Gary.

Answer:  Preston Smith’s release presents a mixed bag; it gives him a chance to find a new team that fits his skill set better, but it also raises questions about his performance trajectory. After a drop in form, Smith may need to prove himself in a new environment, potentially looking for a team that runs a system more conducive to his strengths.

Answer:  Following the release of Preston Smith, the Steelers are likely to prioritize finding a replacement for his role in the linebacking corps, as well as addressing their pass rush deficiencies. They may explore both free agency and the NFL Draft to secure a younger and more productive linebacker. Additionally, they will likely assess their salary cap situation to make further moves, potentially targeting offensive line help or bolstering their secondary as well.

Answer:  Given his prior success and the current market for veteran linebackers, Preston Smith is likely to command a contract that reflects his experience and potential upside. Teams may offer him a short-term deal with incentives based on performance to mitigate risk. A contract in the range of $5-8 million per year could be reasonable, particularly for a team looking for proven leadership and production from a veteran player.

Answer:  Yes, Preston Smith could still be a valuable asset for another team, given his previous production and experience in a 3-4 defensive scheme. While his performance with Pittsburgh was underwhelming, he has demonstrated the ability to be an effective pass rusher in the past, having racked up a total of 70.5 career sacks. A fresh start with a team that better fits his skill set could rejuvenate his career and return him to form.

Answer:  Preston Smith's impact on the Steelers' defense was minimal during his short tenure, as he struggled to adapt to the team's system, managing only two sacks in eight games. The Steelers expected more from him, especially considering his history of success, which included a career-high of 12 sacks in 2019. His inability to contribute significantly on the field ultimately led to his release, as the team looks to improve its pass rush ahead of the next season.

Answer:  While the release of Smith appears final, the NFL landscape is unpredictable. If the Steelers identify a need for veteran depth at linebacker later in the offseason, they may consider re-signing him at a reduced rate. His familiarity with the team and its schemes could make him an attractive option if they fail to secure a higher-impact player.

Answer:  Releasing Smith enhances the Steelers' salary cap flexibility, granting them approximately $27.5 million in savings over the next two years. This newfound capital will be vital as they look to address needs across the roster, particularly to strengthen their defense and improve overall team performance. Strategic spending in free agency could lead to impactful acquisitions that elevate their competitiveness in the league.

Answer:  Smith's performance, while competent during his tenure, did not stand out significantly in comparison to other top-tier linebackers in the NFL. His limited impact with only two sacks in eight games suggests a need for more consistent production, which is often expected at that position. When compared to league leaders, Smith's stats reflect a player who may be better utilized as a rotational piece rather than a starting linebacker.

Answer:  Releasing Preston Smith creates an immediate hole in the Steelers' linebacker corps, as he was expected to be a core part of their defensive strategy. However, it also opens opportunities for younger players to step up or for the Steelers to bring in new talent through the draft or free agency. Balancing experience with fresh legs could ultimately strengthen their defensive unit in the long run.